SHAHZAD ABID versus THE STATE
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 497 (1), Third and Fourth [as amended by the Code of Conduct (Amendment) Ordinance (LIV of 2001)] Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 409/420/468/408/471 bail, a request for a bail bond filed by the defendant on legal delay, was dismissed on the basis that the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Ordinance 2001 was amended. The third and fourth provisions were repealed under section 497. In dealing with the implementation of the amended clause in the Ordinance, 2001, it was expressly stated that this Ordinance would be enforced simultaneously, which would mean that it would potentially work and the Ordinance would not be amended in 2001, thus the section. 497, will not affect requests for bail under the CCPC. The request was already pending at the time of the issuance of the amendment ordinance, when the ordinance was issued, which was currently pending, could not be excluded due to deletion of the third page. According to section 497 (1), the CCP dealt with the delay, the accused was behind bars from the date of his arrest and was not due to any proceedings or omissions by the delay in the trial or Someone else has been accused of acting on her behalf. In the circumstances, he was entitled to bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Mehrab Pur lawyer