Find a Lawyer

SH. MUHAMMAD NASEEM versus AL-MURTAZA SOCIETY

Article 199 (1) (a) (i) Constitutional Petition Writing the prohibition of decades and the issuance of mandamus on plots that were allegedly made for residential purpose, they erected a building where they had a school Appeal was requested by the applicant. To prevent officials from performing their legal duties to cancel a construction project on the plot and to stop the respondent from taking steps to start a school or an educational institution, if a residential plot has already been opened. The plot to be legally and legally used as a school / educational institution may not be used for any other purpose under a lease agreement, unless such facility has been converted Explicit permission is not given by the author in writing and in the present case such necessary license shall be obtained The authority was given by the evidence as well as the evidence on record, it showed that work was being done in the schools around several educational institutions / schools and colleges, in response to the question from the applicants. The girls' school complaint was that their privacy was being severely impacted and that their harassed women were suffering, requiring no permission to change the plot in any way. Permission to get a certificate from residential to facility (plot) and run in the larger interest of the people living in the school neighborhood. Yes, the Constitution petition, held, was without substance and was liable to be rejected. best advocate from Charsada lawyer