Section 1 56 of the Army Code of Conduct (CCPC), Super 350 and 505050 Supderi demanded the termination of an applicant's order of the Additional Sessions Judge, whereby the applicant's class vehicle Superddy was eliminated. In exchange for the persons converting the said vehicle at different times, the undercover vehicle was under police custody for four months, the undercover vehicle was seized under sections 523 and 550, CR PC but no investigation was completed within four months. Could not be At the time and there was no allegation that the vehicle was either stolen or used in a crime, police officials forwarded the vehicle to the relevant customs authorities who confirmed that it was the vehicle that was taken by the Department of Customs. The auctioneer had no justification for arresting the vehicle with the police. It was admitted that he was a clean buyer of the vehicle and no competing claimant was there. It was the possession of the applicant's driver. Therefore, being the last owner was also entitled to interim custody of the confiscated vehicle, the High Court ruled Gadget allowing application
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
