Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus THE STATE

Non-compliance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) Sections 497 and 103 of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 and 25 Section 103, the CCP Complainant has been claimed Affects retrieval based on information and no witness from the eligible area was associated with the recovery process but it is equally true that there was no application on drug matters under the provisions of Section 103, CRPC. As such, the Control of Narcotic Material Stances was not implemented under section 25 of the 1997 Act. Section 103 was not formally available to the accused under the CRPC, as the police officers were good witnesses as long as no one in the public had been accused of any kind of hatred and proved it against them. There is nothing available on the file to indicate that the suspect was wrongly intercepted. Unauthorized desire or intimidation of police officers in this case confessed to the accused best law firm from Bannu lawyer