Find a Lawyer

RASHID AHMAD versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (A) (B) Conan Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts 17 and 46 Definition of Proof He filed an FIR before his death, when he was fully conscious, on the hospital the next day. I met his death. The incident of the accused was fully known to the accused. In his statement, he not only gave full details about the accused but also described the incident in full detail, the manner in which the incident took place and his role. Had stated. The accused presented the reasons for the deceased's statement before his death, not only because it was relevant but also that the evidence under Article 46 of the Law Testimony 1984 was admissible and out of context. There was no previous rivalry between the victim and the accused, and there was no reason why the victim should have been trapped by the victim's story with a liar and malicious, not the truth of the statement and There was at least one element of skepticism regarding the accuracy. The eyewitness, who was not even suspected of being present, had no slight reason to falsely impeach the accused so as to cause serious harm to him. With a convincing explanation of how he was present on the scene, there was a credible witness that the blood stained theft was recovered on the indictment of the accused, who was sent to the Chemical Examiner's office who found that human blood was also recovered. A stained spot was found. It cannot be said for the purpose of planning and for any particular purpose that a non-aggravated criminal prosecution, in the circumstances inheritance advocates near Chakwal lawyer