Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DIN CHAUDHRY versus BORDER AREA COMMITTEE

West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation 1959 Para 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Race Jostata Applied Forward and Closed Transaction Allotment Border Area Committee Examination, subject to jurisdiction Related Issues The constitutional application was located in the Border Belt. Applicants purchased the land from a person in whose favor the allotment was finalized Fifteen years after the allotment on allegations of fraud and illegal action by the Border Area Committee allocating the application against the allotment. Was presented before the committee. The matter has been reopened and the allotment has been canceled because the allotment proposal has been confirmed and no such allotment can be made, the Border Area Committee has already examined the valid allotment. Has been made and may be maintained by the order of the Border Area Committee, 25 4 1982. Do not review its first decision or document, its legal utility did not authorize the Committee to exist solely for the purpose of scrutinizing it, leaving the allotment issue open at all times for scrutiny. The sword hangs over the head and was not even considered a jurisdiction for the jurisdiction nor validated by law although the doctrine of race jostata cannot be applied directly, but still The principle was properly attracted to such cases that the allotment was incorrectly canceled by the Border Area Committee. I was no legal efficacy. property advocates from Noshki lawyer