Find a Lawyer

KHALID ALI LIBRU versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) Pressure on Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (X of 1975), Section 5 Procedure for Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 342 and 340 (2) of the Special Court When I was charged, the person was charged and he was not charged, the accused remained till the next date, but after that date, he moved a petition showing that he was ill and His hearing was adjourned and when the next date was set, he submitted an exemption request. On the date of the illness, which was allowed for the said date, another application was submitted on the next date and was allowed to leave and his lawyer's presence was counted on his presence, it was alleged, Absent his bail again on the next date, his arrest warrants were issued, and subsequent arrest warrants were issued against him and his bail was also investigated during the legal proceedings. The officer's statement was recorded and the case adjourned to record the statement of the accused under section 342, CR PC. In this date, the accused did not appear personally, his lawyer wrote a statement on his behalf and the matter was settled for argument and later the decision was made before the expiry of the 60 days prescribed under section 5A (7). After the declaration, the accused was declared guilty, the Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975 applied to set aside the verdict so that he could be involved in the action from which he departed. Which was not allowed and the accused arrested for sentencing law firms from Patika lawyer