Find a Lawyer

MST. SUGHRAN BEGUM versus FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 suit for declaration of Islamic law inherited by the plaintiff claimed that the suit plot was purchased from him and he erected a two-storeyed building and the plaintiff, who was his son, sued property and the plaintiff. Was in unauthorized occupation of. The claimant claimed that he had purchased the property in favor of his father in dispute from his allotment and, according to the power of attorney, that his father set the record in evidence for transfer of the property in favor of the defendant. Provided that the suit property had made foreclosure property in the interest of both the plaintiff and the defendant, and that the plaintiff / his widow, three sons, were left behind by the other legal heirs of the plaintiff in interest. And the two daughters, including the plaintiff's High Court, set aside the judgment and injunction of the court and the plaintiff was given a declaration that he was entitled to the 1 / 8th share in the suit property as the widow of the predecessor in interest. While the defendant is entitled to the 14/64 th, the remaining two sons and daughters are left unconnected 14/64 and 7, respectively. Each son and each daughter has 64th shares registration advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer