STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus MST. MAQSOODAN BIBI
Sections 45 and 39 of Law Proof (10 of 1984), Article 78 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXXII, R4 Proof of incorrect information, signature and handwriting evidence to suit insurance company for recovery of insurance money The plaintiff's insurance company stated that at the time of obtaining the insurance policy, the defendant's insured / deceased husband had given incorrect information because his health case was ruled by the trial court, but the appellate court's accuracy insurance policy gave him Deleted. The plaintiffs did not deny Rs 75,000 at the time of his payment The deceased declared that he did not face any serious illness which was confirmed by the area sales officer claimant when the other claim of the insurance policy. Time inquired. His investigator, who submitted his report that the deceased was suffering from blood cancer and liver disease, did not make any inquiry in relation to the Rs 75 claim. , Def 000 Defend The plaintiff's case was that her husband died of a heart attack. The investigator as well as the author confessed that he did not investigate in connection with the claim of Rs 75,000, the plaintiff failed to present the original record of the hospital and the documents were not examined by the doctor and the brother of the deceased. In addition to the court records relating to illness statements, copies of documents were not produced without proof of signature and a written written investigation report could not be declared an accurate, reliable or conclusive proof of the fact. The plaintiff's insurance company served a two-year term as he was suffering from blood cancer or liver disease. To investigate after the payment is over
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
