Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34) Qualifying Definition of Joint Intent Evidence The prosecution did not present any plausible explanation for the delay of hours to reporting the case to the police, when the incident occurred. Was playing cricket jointly with the defendants, in which case, no conventional weapon could be used as a prediction, not all the prosecution's witnesses agreed that the co-accused (since evil) In this case, the person killed by the hit of the affected bat received only one injury, which happened on the spot and caused The mystery was inundated, and it could not be explained even when filing a crime report, which was the case with many people recently. The prosecution, in the circumstances, failed to re-establish the case, and the OCular account contradicted each other, especially when the purpose of the case was not planned. The evidence was not supported, the prosecution lacked sufficient witness testimony in the case, and the statements of the prosecution witnesses contradicted There were instances. The trial against the accused was very suspicious and every suspicion was to be raised in favor of the convicted in the trial case, it was set aside, taking advantage of the doubt in favor of the accused. Was released and released. , Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
