Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus THE STATE

Section 2 302/34 & & 4 394 / App the Appreciation of Evidence The criminals who were not acquainted with the complainant and other witnesses in the darkness of the night, were unknown at the site of the accused in the FIR. The names were not included and he was not involved in the current case in any capacity until his arrest in another case, no motive was established by the prosecution and the arms recovered illegally. No crime scene detection was found with. The identification parade was also held on this score, and it is generally not expected from the eyewitnesses that their identity could not be valid even after seeing them momentarily during this moment. One of the suspects was not identified by the witnesses during the parade, while the other accused was not taken with reference. During this incident it was paid by him and his identity had no result; legal result Medical evidence denied the prosecutor's version, the suspect was present at the scene at the time and other witnesses were present. That the accused was acquitted under the circumstances. best advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer