Find a Lawyer

QAMAR ABDUL SATTAR BAJWA versus ALLAH DITTA

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 417 (2) of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), the special leave of the itt acquitt appeal, the High Court of Appeal and the prosecution witnesses testified that they had committed the crime The defendant who committed the crime was not seen. He confessed that in fact he had informed one of the other two witnesses of the prosecution about the incident when the prosecution's witnesses proved to be unconvincing to the respondents during the trial. The matter was pending and the parties were facing pending cases before various courts. The witnesses were presented during the trial to support the allegations that it was difficult to believe that with the aforementioned grounds of enmity, the respondents would spend the night in the complainant's house, prosecutors' witnesses said. There was no evidence of ownership of the gold jewelry on the record, nor was there any gold jewelry details given during the trial. And they strained the relationship with the complainant with the judgment rendered by the trial court It was neither valid nor false and it was based on valid reasons that the trial court's conclusions could not be lightly dismissed under mere assumption. A different result was possible as the High Court dismissed the application and accordingly the leave of appeal was denied. ask a advocate free from Shahkot lawyer