AHMAD BAKHSH versus SHAUKAT ALI KHAN, SPECIAL JUDGE OF SPECIAL COURT UNDER ANTI-TERRORISM ACT, MULTAN
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 365A, 468, 471, 419 and 420 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 2 (d) (n) and 23 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Jurisdiction for Counter Terrorism The court was a special law of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, and under the provisions contained in it, the provisions of section 2 (d) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, shall be subordinated to the general law, which means that the child is a child. The accused is from a person who has attained the age of 18 while Section 2 N has been defined. Abduction of a person without his consent or power to kidnap and illegally detain him and demand special or other benefits from him as a condition of his release Section 2 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 There was no nexus with the definition of a child given in (D). Along with the age of the abductor, a complaint was lodged against the accused under Section 656565A, CPC which sentenced him to death or life imprisonment. Abducted In view of the allegations contained in Section 2N of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and the intention of the Legislature, the Anti-Terrorism Court obtained exclusive jurisdiction for the trial of the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Tando Allahyar lawyer