Find a Lawyer

AMIRZADA KHAN versus AHMAD NOOR

Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 8 and 42 of the Martyrs (10 of 1984), Arts 73, 74 and 100 of the Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Sections 17 and 49 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 39. Transfer Act (VI of 1882), Section 573 of a Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 144 suit which claims that his predecessor claimed to own the property purchased in interest. Prayed for the occupation and its announcement. The trial court ruled that the suit had been settled after it was settled, but the appellate court reversed the appellate court's decision and restored the trial's verdict. Piece. A copy of the contract photo was submitted for sale with unregistered and non-stamped copy of the contract for proof, directing the preparation of the original document and leading to the secondary evidence after the supporter without court leave Because of the loss or destruction of the original plaintiff who did not request the loss or destruction of the original contract, therefore, the best available evidence was guilty of withholding the evidence because the contents of such documents intended to transfer the absolute ownership of the land. Has been done, so regardless of the registration required. , Even if such a document was a contract to sell or sell, such document is unacceptable in evidence, no inference can be made about its accuracy or validity. The necessary details regarding the identity of the land in such document. Is lacking and will not transfer any valid title in favor of it as unregistered. The plaintiff's High Court, without referring to such aspect of the case, advocate from Jhudo lawyer