MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR versus POSTMASTER-GENERAL PUNJAB, LOWER MALL. LAHORE
Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RRL & 2 suit for declaration and permanent injunction restraining order, granting the plaintiff's grant to the defendant who was employed by the house Filed an application for, but his application was rejected and the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for trial and permanent injunction as well as a stay under O XXXXX, RR l & 2, CPC, which Simultaneously, the trial court and the appellate court rejected the applicant, who was dismissed from his job. The Daily Wage also filed a lawsuit in front of the Labor Court for maintaining a flat on the basis of their employment; the Labor Court rejected the applicant's request, it filed an appeal before the Labor Appellate Tribunal where the application was made. The applicant could not appeal to the applicant's jurisdiction. At one time in the courts, especially when he was not in the service of the defendant / applicant, in the circumstances, there was no cause for action or the Lux Standby Institute suit applicant did not have a case The plaintiff was rightly denied along with the application for accommodation of the court and unanimous decision of the court cannot be interfered with by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
