Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FARID versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 379/411 pre-arrest bail, confirmation of alleged theft remained unwarranted and the indictment of the alleged accused involved directly or There was no indirect evidence. The theft of the stolen property was a private recovery and the stolen material was not recovered from a particular person, but was also allegedly recovered from a Dera belonging to another person, investigation records showed. The litigation had no legal precedent to show the basis. Accused of allegedly committing theft or their involvement in handling stolen property was charged with the complaining party as well as the local police Has also become deprecated. Without a basis or suspicion of substance, however, reasonable evidence can never be substituted without reasonable doubt, the warrant for the interim arrest of a wanted ad in a criminal case was already allowed, in the circumstances confirmed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Malakwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.