Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, OKARA

West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 5, Schedule A & S, 9 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Suit Defendant's claim for recovery of Dover amount is Rs. 50,000 in marriage contract. The postponement was fixed as indoor and Rs 500 was fixed as immediate indoor and immediately indoor (Rs 500) was paid to the plaintiff and the plaintiff with a deferred delay of Rs 50,000. The family court rejected the case, but the appellate court dismissed the family court's affidavit that the plaintiff had signed a written receipt / agreement in the presence of witnesses. In recognition aside, depending by the defendant, judgment documents / invoices, that neither defendant had attached to his written statement, nor rely lists was mentioned. Receipt / Contract Defendant did not comply with section 9 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 and did not contend with the plaintiff. When the plaintiff appeared in court and the plaintiff had no opportunity to deny the alleged receipt / agreement executed by the defendant, the alleged receipt / agreement relied on when it was written on paper which was presented with badge. And was implemented when there was no conflict. Was present between the parties and the defendant did not make any specific mention of the document in his written statement, but no comprehensible justification was given by the defendant about the creation of the document in any way. That this document was a product of fraud and fraud, it was removed by the Appellate Court. immigration advocates phone number from Qazi Ahmed lawyer