Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ KHAN versus HAJI NAWAB KHAN

The Specific Relief Act 1877 section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract was earlier pending a lawsuit challenging the change of inheritance between the competitor and his half brothers and sisters, in which a decision was made on the matter between the parties. Was granted and the plaintiff acquired his share of the plaintiff in this case. It was claimed that during the indictment of the said case, the defendant agreed to the execution of an agreement that the plaintiff in the village in his village sued the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiff in the suit. The transfer case will be discussed and the plaintiff will bear it. In the previous case, all litigation costs were filed by the plaintiff in favor of the defendant in the first case under a decree based on the agreement by the defendant. The defendant denied any agreement that he had only the thumbprints. In favor of the plaintiff, but that was, obtaining a special power, o the attorney, marking the thumb on the blank paper, justifying the pending litigation between himself and his half brothers and sisters. Acknowledged that the thumb impression on the blank paper was intended for another purpose for which this case was used by the plaintiff, but the defendants could not relinquish this responsibility because they were the defendant's rights. I could not offer a reason for the special powers attorney to execute when they were not related to each other. Failed to reject execution. Claimant A. lawer from fb area from Zahir Pir lawyer