RAFAQAT MASIH versus MAQSOOD BIBI
Divorce Act 1869 Section 10 Christian Marriage Act (XV of 1872), Articles 4, 10 and 19 for both plaintiffs' wives appeared in court and stated that they preferred to die somewhere with their husbands. ? It was alleged that she was married to her minority and since 1995, the parties have been under legal influence under the influence of the parties and according to the statement of the parties, they have suffered from harassing and traumatic situation. The plaintiffs were passing and the plaintiffs have refused to appear before the court. The influence of husbands would not allow a religion of hateful unity which was not based on the true consent of the parties, especially in the Christian Marriage Act, 1872, where marriage was a sacrament, and at the time of marriage both parties were happy to death and sorrow. I promise to stand together. Leave them. Peer, whose influence the parties were closed, did not allow trial court to dismiss the case, after the appellate court ruled that the women's suit was rightly dismissed and the trial court dismissed the High Court. The court refused to interfere with the decree.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Takhtbai lawyer