Find a Lawyer

MALIK SHAUKAT, HAYAT versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

When Electric Power Company was initially employed as appellant meter reader on the basic pay scale related to the West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act 1958 Section 18 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 House Rent Allowance Fixation. The company took over. Salary was finalized under the notification issued under Section 18 of the Water and Power Development Authority, Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act, 1958, drawing drawings on Meter Readers Basic Salary Scale 5 in the Water and Power Development Authority. But is already receiving the salary. Appellant's meter was higher than that of other meter readers working in the Water and Power Development Authority, and accordingly, the base rent of Appellant's scale from Basic Pay Scale 7 was determined on the basis of which position. He appeals and appeals to the service. The Tribunal was dismissed that the plea raised by the appellant was that the basic salary was to fix the rent of the house as per SC. It is being enjoyed by it and not by the posts it has. Waldetty House Rent Allowance was able to pay basic salary and everyone would benefit from it according to their basic salary scale and not the salary scale of the applicant as per their rank or post would not bother the department or their colleagues as the higher salary Due to the K package, they were paid more, the electric power company was drawing higher salaries by the appellant, and the scale house was entitled to draw. Rent allowance plus its pay list of supreme court advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer