THE STATE versus RUB DINO SHAIKH
Articles 420/468/34 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the United Kingdom, presenting the original sanction order on the charge of forgery or forgery Was done, and there is no evidence. Regarding the allegation that the accused presented the forged signatures on the said sanction orders, the fact that the signature of the photo copy of the sanctioning orders did not agree with the signature of the department officer was alleged The cap on the signatures was not proven. The restraining orders were given by the accused, such clearance orders must be signed or proved by the accused so that they could be convicted of the crime of forgery so that there is no evidence on record to link the accused to the commission. Was. The verdict for the purpose of forgery or forgery fraud did not face any illegal proceedings, according to which the leave to appeal was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Swabi lawyer
