Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QAYYUM versus D.G., PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION, JS HQ, RAWALPINDI

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 3 (b), 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 & 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Termination of employment without conducting regular inquiry involved the imposition of a charge against the public servant in preparation of the fake documents against the public servant, in which a reply to the showcase notice issued on the basis of the preliminary inquiry was answered by the Government Employee Authorized Authority I found the government employee guilty. Under the Public Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules 1973, the state tribunal upheld an appeal for a formal inquiry into the legal records of public servants. The charge sheet, along with the statement of the charges against the public servants, was required under these rules to provide a reasonable opportunity to respond to the allegations. The warrant was entitled to present evidence in the authorized authority of the regular investigator in light of the evidence of the witnesses and the inquiry officer's disclosure, but without witnessing the procedure for the inquiry, the respondents had sentenced the civil servant. Was given The basis of the preliminary inquiry is that the competent officer stated in his note that action was being taken against the public servants on charges of misconduct under the provisions of the Government Employees (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules 1973, thus transferring the need for regular investigation. Without a clear mandate, the general rule of separation was not legal, and the employee was dismissed from the job without conducting a corruption investigation by conducting a proper investigation and giving him the opportunity to be heard, even if the matter in question was a government matter. Employee and co-worker patent advocate from Swatmingora lawyer