Find a Lawyer

AMJAD IKRAM versus LAHORE CANTT. COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LTD. (NOW D.H.A.) LAHORE CANTT.

In the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 204 Contempt of Court Act (LXIV of 1976), the Chief Executive Order of the contempt court, no one could be authorized to disobey or disobey the orders of the court. How it can be configured. Neither can be attributed to the intention that the High Court orders in question were not in doubt, nor was there any doubt about their usefulness and thus should be complied with. Was being used as a school where many students were studying and receiving. Education that was interrupted and stopped was suddenly used by losers with the use of force and powerful force to make it possible for the youth of the nation to have such an opportunity not to be measured and counted. The only reason was that the school was in a residential house, a cause of concern for the area and the residents as the school had been operating for a long time, as well as any other continuation of the halting and stopping of the cell. In addition to the provisions of section 151, assigning inherent power to the CPC may invalidate the right and cause the wrongdoing Cannot allow committing locations to, so it was instructed to release it shortly to allow. Respondents for the educational institution to work until at least the writ petition was heard, however, they decided not to comply with the court order and risked facing the consequences. The number of times was made available. Respondents, in contempt of court, to improve this situation criminal advocate from Hala lawyer