Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

DIN MUHAMMAD versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN POST OFFICE, ISLAMABAD


Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Civil Servants (Seniority) Rules, 1993, R4 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), retaining appeal against section 8 service tribunal only after the seniority list filed against its seniority list In the year 1987, after the expulsion, the government employee also expressed his displeasure with the seniority list issued in 1999, filed a department appeal and subsequently the appeal was filed, according to the service tribunal. The objection was that the sanitary list published in 1987 had not been changed, appeal was preferred against it. Subsequent seniority list was not sustained Such an objection would not result because after the publication of the seniority list later in 1999, the service employee's appeal was retained before the government employee's appeal was retained. There will be a new reason.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Chak 4 b c lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.