Find a Lawyer

NAFISUDDIN versus SAGHIR AHMAD

Sindh Rented Prices Ordinance 1979 Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The personal necessity of the landlord for personal enhancement of the home was required that the charge was not clearly contradicted by the tenants. Was. The landlord who claimed to have been unemployed for the past 8 years, bought a building and ran a marble factory or operated his business in the absence of this documentary evidence. There was no legitimate piece to the High Court's decision to dismiss the landlord's factual and untrue assertion that the evidence could not be considered that the request of the landlord to consider new documents was destroyed by an officer. Offer to inspect premises S source was not implementing it is clearly a strong case in defense of tenants that had been proposed. Thus, the facts recorded by the appellate court were not appropriate and it was confirmed by the High Court that the decisions made by the two courts were based on accurate and careful review of the evidence which was of public importance. No facts about the law. And the circumstances of the case raised before the Supreme Court request for leave of appeal, were excluded in those circumstances patent advocate from Bagh lawyer