MST. JEHAN ARA versus RAJA ZAFARULLAH JANJUA
Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 Section 15 The personal need of the landlord could not be suitable for personal landlord's failure to examine himself and his representation as a lawyer was not fatal to his base record. ? The present case shows that the proprietor has been able to establish his case by providing ample evidence of his lawyer, and even a witness in support of his argument does not deny his claim of personal aggression before the proprietor. has been. Needs witnesses clearly stated in their evidence that the landlord needed the premises to be in good need of his personal belongings and that he had demanded evacuation of the premises several times but the tenant refused to do so. Which the tenant never contradicted in his evidence. The Supreme Court, accepting the landlord's appeal, allowed the tenant 30 days to make matters worse.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer
