MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus SHAHZAD ASGHAR DAR
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 185 (3) The auction for retaining constitutional submissions was the case of the closing contract applicant to receive the Booker Mandi contract fee, it is a past and closed transaction and the contractor who started the collection of fees. What was Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the High Court had no jurisdiction to interfere in any matter, the applicant's dispute was based on power, the securities had to be attached to a concluding agreement but the said contract should be transparent and Should have The agreement should not be misconstrued in the interest of the leasing entity in the aggregate, nor does it mean that the public treasury is exercised in an arbitrary and unreasonable way to a party. Should not face extra favor. For the last year, the second auction for 11 months was priced at Rs 11,25,000 while the existing lease rights were Rs 8,25,000 with a net loss of Rs. It was appropriate and appropriate for me to intervene in the matter given because it protected the interests of both parties so that the petition for leave to appeal against the order was dismissed by the Supreme Court in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer