Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus FATEH MUHAMMAD

Defendant could not refuse to enforce the sale agreement for the specific performance of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 suit sale agreement, but he alleged that the agreement was a result of unlawful influence, repression and It was not with the free consent of the defendant, who was an old man. Poor health testimony of the Registrar showed that there were parties to the settlement of the matter and that the sale agreement was executed with the plaintiff's wife and daughter, in the circumstances, on the basis of evidence on record at trial. The court was fully proved. The defendant had entered into a contract with his free consent and without trial, the Court of Appeal had considered the evidence on record and the following trial court had, in the circumstances, obtained the result of the affidavit filed by both the courts. Did not commit any illegal acts in declaring. patent advocate from Mir Ali lawyer