Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEH versus QAMAR-UD-DIN

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 & 27 (b) for the sale of the contract claimed that the plaintiff owned the plaintiff and the plaintiff was a tenant in the land and regularly paid the defendant rent which suits Was willing to sell the land. The plaintiff promised the defendant that he had promised to perform the sale upon receipt of the balance amount, through the sale agreement for consideration and after receiving several amounts from the plaintiff, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant Ali worked to sell the land to another shopkeeper instead of executing the sale on the due date The plaintiff had violated the sale agreement executed by the plaintiff in his favor, however, the defendant had The sale process could not be proved in favor of any of the allegations not stated in the statement that the second seller is allegedly Was aware of the first sale agreement executed in favor of the plaintiff. In other cases, by the defendant, the other shopkeeper was a very good buyer of the suit land in the sense of securities, by the Special Relief Act, Trial Court of 1877 and Appellate Court N 27 (b), in the circumstances filed by the plaintiff. Was rightfully excluded. jobs for advocates from Moro lawyer