GUL NAMIR versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR. A.C. SWABI
The Revenue Record does not support the assertion of the claim for compensation increase due to the improvements in sections 23 and 54 of the suit that the installation of diesel pumps on the land was made under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894. Was before the release. After the issuance of such notification, the pump will not entitle the appellant to any improvement as the PW has admitted that the land was situated outside the main village, two miles away from Pakka / Road, Patwari. "Myra" is kind. The record does not indicate that the appellant had applied for the appointment of a local commissioner in which the market value of the land could be estimated. The value of the land fixed by the collector and the trial was maintained by the court, the High Court dismissed the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Dera Bugti lawyer
