WAZIRDULLAH versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, A.C. SWABI
Articles 23 and 54 of Conan Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 74 and 76, claim that the trial court awarded the appellate verdict fixed by the trial court for excessive sale of adjacent land. The money received was disputed landowner and a furling distance from a main road was on the burden of proof in connection with the proper sale of adjoining lands. Copies of such sales variations would be insufficient only in production. The duty of the consumer is to examine such a sale transaction to a party. Such documents may not be considered for conversion of such sales records on the record as being third party evidence of such sale transactions, unless permitted by the court as per evidence of the law, 1984 The High Court dismissed the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer
