Find a Lawyer

SHER KHAN versus THE STATE

The passage of the Proof of Section 9 of the Drugs Act 1997, in its statement, stated in a brief testimony regarding the recovered memo that five slabs of cannabis were recovered from the possession of the accused, but sealed in court under the trial court's order. On opening the closed parcel. There were twenty slabs in it, the Investigation Officer could not provide the exact number of slabs recovered from the suspect's possession, the second minor evidence of recovery was not presented by the prosecution witnesses acknowledged that the recovered substance was extracted. The specimen was taken from a slab and not recovered from the slab. In the circumstances, it was highly suspected that the recovery had taken place at the General Bus Stand, which was a thickly populated area, but no one from the public was arrested by the investigating officer. Was not affiliated, it is said that the case of recovery prosecution is full of doubts, the accused has been widely suspected. Idaho was justified. He was acquitted of the charge and ordered to be released from jail immediately attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Abbaspur lawyer