ABDUL REHMAN versus AMRAT
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 8 of the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act (v. 1962), Section 3 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 45 led to the action in the Revenue of Occupation by the Participants. Because of the record the plaintiffs took the basis of the defamation on the basis that the transfer was the property of the limited property and under section 3 of the West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Sharia) Application Act, 1962, it could not transfer more property than the legal property and The court in favor of the defendants in the decree passed by the judicial court was set aside on the ground that Dayun the ban on the issue of time, therefore, he is faced with permanent registration of legal action in common shares, therefore, rights records. In the interests of the plaintiffs and if the plaintiffs' rights are denied on each such entry every four years, the plaintiff had the authority to file a case for every denial and a new reason for filing each denial should be presented in this case. This aspect of K was not accepted by the appellate court, which passed the judgment and the order passed by the appellate court was set aside and the trial court's decision was reinstated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Chacklala lawyer