Find a Lawyer

SYED SHAUKAT ALI SHAH versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Civil Procedure Code Order VI VI Ordinarily, O VI, R 17 & O VIII, R 1 In the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 amending the written statement in the constitutional application suit His written statement correctly acknowledges the defendant's paragraph 1 and after filing the evidence and recording the evidence of the plaintiff, after five years for the defendants to file and record the evidence of the plaintiff. The lawsuit was filed in which his written amendment was requested. The statement was rejected by the trial court, but was allowed in the appeal. An attempt was made to verify the legitimate amendment that the statement in paragraph 1 of the written statement was to some extent a result of oversight and should be permitted or denied in writing. The plaintiff opposed the militant amendment against the initial position by the plaintiff because the amendment was characterized by a refusal to enter, which had the effect of changing the scope and color of the dispute. The effect would not only be to reopen the case, but also to require a de novo trial; the trial amendment was rightly rejected. And the appellate court did not justify allowing the same court to freely exercise the power to amend the petitions, but the facts and circumstances of the case and the effect of the amendment attempt cannot be ignored. Saying that the constitutional application for power was accepted, the Appellate Court found no legal effect. how to become a advocate from Punch lawyer