Find a Lawyer

MIRZA NASEEM AHMAD versus DR. SADIQA SHARIF

Banking Companies (Debt Recovery) Ordinance 1979 Sections 8 and 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXI, Rr 58 and 95 Declaration Procedure Auction Property Objection of Property Petition Auction property indicating that the appellant object that they owned I was the property not covered by the auction certificate issued in favor of the auction buyer; the banking court instructed the appellants to appear personally and to present proof of ownership of the property, but on failure to do so, was dismissed. The request was dismissed, before the banking court was concerned with the identification of the property, the auction buyer said. The auction was purchased and the auctioneer was entitled to possession of the property and the property he had auctioned and bought, but in the auction wrap, the property belonging to others was not given to his banking court. Go. As it should have provided the appellants with a reasonable and reasonable opportunity to establish their claim, this was all the more urgent in the application of the objection, when the rights, title and interest of the complainants were to be decided only by the executing court. And no separate lawsuit could be filed under the law in this regard, the Banking Court did not bother to investigate its claims. According to the law, the appellants, but did not hold them fit on false grounds, should have been decided by the request of the object after the parties had presented evidence and recorded the documents, by which it could be easily settled. The property is owned by the said individuals and allegedly owned by their tenants. This case is blue inheritance advocates near Skardu lawyer