Find a Lawyer

HAMMAD KHALID versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, ISLAMABAD

Clauses 5 and 9 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner questioned his involvement and involvement in the reference submitted by the National Accountability Bureau, which was before the Accountability Court. And he also asked for a statement. In connection with the said reference, the applicant's detention was without legal authority nor any legal influence, the applicant also submitted that the present constitutional petition was also considered as a petition for bail for the applicant. can go. The petitioner and his accomplices were picked up by the National Accountability Bureau at the inception of the High Court when allegations against the petitioner and his accomplices were brought before the High Court in another case and the allegations made false. Was related to usage. Large amount of money deposited in co-op for the purchase of tractors by citizens and at least 740 of such persons had so far failed to obtain a tractor, and most of the money raised by such persons was For the petitioner he remained unaccounted for, though he was a director not a part of the company but at the same time he is not only the son of the principal director of the company, but he is also the business development manager and the issuing of the check from the aforesaid company petitioner. Was an authorized signatory for the purpose of, as well as its co-authorized signatory. The company, all issued checks from the aforementioned company, and, thus, assuming that the cash probe officer of the company had deposited the goods, it would appear that the applicant was financially responsible. tax advocates from Bhimbar lawyer