BEGUM RIFFAT AHAD versus NAB
National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Declaration was requested by the applicant that her husband's arrest was without legal authority, the State Bank of Pakistan sued No reference was filed to Neither the case against the applicant's husband nor the case is pending with the State Bank, but the question of recovery of the default loan is pending before the cooperative judge, who can determine the applicant's husband's final obligation. 28,00,000 was deposited by the applicant's husband because his papers were approved nomination and he was allowed to contest in the general election that the applicant's husband had his or her basis and substance. Was not provided for which he was arrested. Particularly by the Deputy Prosecutor General NAB but copies of these grounds were not kept on the record even as it was not brought on record as to who was the complainant in this case which is likely that the husband of the applicant is the Deputy Prosecutor General NAB. A lawsuit was filed against him, after a court inquiry had submitted that Datino had borrowed on insufficient securities. And the Inquiry Officer would like to have a hand in these documents for reference, before the petition filed by the Punjab Cooperative Board in connection with the verification clearly showed that the Board had full knowledge of all the documents which The loan was not obtained on the basis. Disregarding the fact that the Inquiry Officer can always engage Datu in any kind of investigation or investigation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Jaffarabad lawyer