SABAZ ALI KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199, 187 (2) and 190 Constitutional Appeal A Company Applicants Implementation of Order of the Supreme Court Management Trainee Scheme was not absorbed in regular services after completing the training of the Supreme Court while the High Court filed against the judgment. The appeal was denied. The court rejected the applicant's constitutional request and observed that the company had decided to add a new trainee in this case, the applicant would be free to apply for the position and the company would pay full attention to the fact that He successfully completed a training company and then applied for positions. Several times, but each time the applicant was not considered, the accuracy Supreme Court directed the respondents to consider the applicant's case only at the time of appointment, which the respondents showed from the chart on record. It achieved 47% 67%. Such a chart also reveals the position maintained in the merit list in the number 20 and serial number 20. The four former trains were appointed to take the position of merit in serial numbers 2, 3, 4 and 13. In such cases the respondents did not violate the directions of the Supreme Court as the petitioner hid the material facts from the High Court as the contents of the Constitution were not disclosed. Nevertheless, he appeared in the written examination and interview and did not succeed in the merit list in Serial No 20 and could not attain his status, so the applicant did not approach the High Court. Honor in favor of the applicant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer