AJAB SULTANA versus THE STATE
Section 9 of the Drugs Understanding Act of 1997 was not defined as any misrepresentation or illiteracy as a result of the miscarriage of justice, it was alleged in the judgment that it seized 16000 grams of hashish Did not specify his position on being and his lonely words. It did not result in false accusations without a positive attempt at persuasion, which the police officer, who was a witness to the commission of the crime, was not legally bound to be the complainant and the investigating officer in the case unless That the accused were not prejudiced in any way and that there was no room for abandoning such inquiry and failing the trial, the conviction of the accused was maintained in the circumstances that the accused women were the first offenders. And the drugs recovered from them were less than ten kilograms, not charged in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 (c) of the Control of the Na Mr. suspect was severely punished arkutk Substance Act, 1997 was reduced substantially
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Dadu lawyer
