Find a Lawyer

SIDDIQULLAH versus THE STATE

Sections 6 and 8 of the NWFP Gambling Ordinance 1978 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 561A & 5 (2), Schedule II petitioner emphasized the order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, under which its application was made under section 249A , CR was under PC. It was dismissed on the ground that the posts of the District Magistrate, Sub Divisional Magistrate and Magistrate First Class (Executive) had ceased to exist so there was no one in the aforesaid position to supervise the raid under the Joint Ordinance 1978 and so on. Criminals should not be punished for crimes. In accordance with Section 5 (2) of the CRPC, investigations, trials and inquiries against other laws should be implemented under a particular law to regulate the same footnote under the same schedule. The CRPC, under other rules, explained the manner and manner of the inquiry regarding the nature of the crime and the length of the sentence and explained that the fine above three years 6r was admissible and the remainder. The words also did not support the statement that the offenses under the said ordinance, which were not punishable by more than three years imprisonment, were also not significant. As the police declared them unacceptable under such analogy, under Section 8 of the said ordinance, raids, arrest of accused and recovery of articles All options were restored with the category of magistrate. It mentioned the role of the police in assisting the magistrate in conducting such exercises under section 8 of the ordinance police, thus, under section 8 of the ordinance, jobs for advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer