Find a Lawyer

SAID KHOBAN versus MOMIN KHAN

Law Evidence Order 1984 Article 79 Evidence Act (I of 1872), Section 68 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 6 Document, Proof of Regulation Failure to Produce Two Certified Testimony, Implementation of Controversial Sale Agreement and Case Prior to filing, the litigation demand was raised by the 1984 petitioner that the defendant failed to produce two witnesses, so the controversial sale law was not proved under Article 6 of the Convention of Evidence, document under section 6868 / Proof of Implementation of the Evidence Act, 1872, was required to confirm a witness that any law under section 6 of the General Clause Act, 1897 N applied or canceled at this time does not affect anything in the current when it was canceled. The new law of law, the law of martyrdom. , 1984 1984 1984, came into existence in 1984 in sale, the controversial sale agreement was written in 19 the63 and the case was entered into the year 198 filed33 in which the work of controversial sale was written and Prior to the issuance of the suit-proof law at 1984 of 1984, the implementation of this act was to be proved in the light of section 18 of the Act of 1868, nor was the testimony of the law under Article 79 of the 1984 Act 1984, both 1984 Both the courts below were properly relied upon. Controversial sale deadline High Court refuses to interfere in decisions under which both courts approve tax advocates from Gujrat lawyer