MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus QAMAR ALI
Code of Conduct 1908 Sections 11, 114, A XLIII, R 1 (r) and O XLVII, R 1 The Additional District Judge dismissed the appeal filed against the trial court's denial of his trial which his earlier appeal. The exit was not disclosed. The appeal, but the petitioner of the High Court requested review of the High Court order on the ground that the Additional District Judge had no jurisdiction in the matter, thus, the law passed by him was faulty in the eyes of the law. , A trial court valid order was found. Under the order of the Additional District Judge, the applicant himself filed an appeal before the Additional District Judge, which rejected him on the merit, in which, in view of Section 11, the Additional District Judge was divided between the parties on the principle of the Radical Judiciary. The order was final, the CPC applicant wanted to discuss again in the apex of the revision petition, which was not allowed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Ambela lawyer