WAK (PRIVATE)\' LIMITED, LAHORE versus COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE & SALES TAX (ADJUDICATION), CUSTOMS HOUSE, LAHORE
Sections 36, 36 (1), 46 and 47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and the Central Excise Rules, 1944, RR 10 & 10 (3) of the Central Excise Act (I of 1944), section 36 (c) of any sale with additional duty Demand for excise duty on tax. The Tax and Penal Tribunal separated the order in the original and remanded case for de novo action and issued modified show cause notices to the authority. The foregoing notice states that the Central Excise Rules, under R10 (3), rather than R10 of 1944. And under section 39 (1) instead of section 36 of the Other Sales Tax Act 1990, as stated in the first notice, the cables of the new notice and the ability to issue it were challenged before the Collector (judiciary). Was, which, by short order, delayed the decision on such an object. The trial will be processed with final settlement. The tribunal refused to interfere with the collector's order, and the matter was still occupied, and in the event of a negative finding, the appellant would have the right to appeal to the tribunal, section 36 of the Central Excise Act 1944. (c) There was no question of tribunal entertainment by the High Court under the High Court or Section 47 High Court of Sales Tax Act 1990 dismissed the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
