Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ AHMAD KHAN versus DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN

West Pakistan Citizens Rent Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Defending Tenant Withdrawal Liability For Offering Summons And Fraudulent Service Against Tenants On Tenant Execution The submission of the application was submitted to the court, defending the landlord's owner, after which all four motions were met, but after that the tenant's defense was terminated. It was approved by the rent controller for cross inspection and was maintained by the appellate court tenant and was told that the summons was not issued and fraud was committed if the tenant The lawyer nevertheless chose not to cross-examine the witnesses. Opportunity was granted to him .What, the fact that there was no intention of fraud could have been removed from the fact that the case was not investigated by a lawyer for the facts or concluded that the opposing party did not. The Tenant Controller has the jurisdiction to decide on the eviction request under the West Pakistan Urban Rent Prohibition Ordinance 1959. The appeal against the rent controller's order was provided under the law before the district court tenant himself requested the district judge's jurisdiction, so he did not lie in his mouth, saying that What the appellate court ruled was without legal authority. The orders passed by the Rent Controller and the Appellate Court were not without jurisdiction or without legal authority. The constitutional application was dismissed under the circumstances. jobs for fresh advocates from Buchay Key lawyer