Find a Lawyer

CRESCENT TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED versus BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES OLD AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION

Section 2 (BB), 33 and 35 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Employees Old Age Benefit Act 1976 (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution, requires employees to respond to a notice of claim for an outstanding Old Age benefit Get some details from the Authority Ending applicant filed an application before the Adjudicating Officer, who, with the consent of the parties, appointed a commission to determine the actual charges payable by the applicant, on the basis of which the Adjudicating Officer The application was dismissed, the applicant was of the view that the persons for whom the contractor was employed It was. With regard to his employment in the industry / establishment it cannot be said that the applicant's employees were obliged to submit this amount to the company as the applicant was obliged to submit the amount to the company as per the definition of Section 2 (BB) of the Employee Act. The applicants did not take any special stand before filing. Under section 33 of the Act, the application is directed to pay challenging dues. The Respect for Employees on the Contract Petition raised such a question before the Adjudicating Officer without giving details of the employees of the Contractor and with the consent of the parties appointed by the Commission. Detection of source fact and subsequent disturbing order was not supported by the Adjudicating Officer and the Appellate Authority in the constitutional jurisdiction, through substantial material which could not be taken exceptionally, the High Court in the constitutional application Excluded best advocate from Toru lawyer