Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN LAWYERS FORUM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

The Chief Executive Order 12, Referendum Order 2002 Arts 9 and 4 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 213, 218, 48 and 1991 Constitutional Application Election Commission was submitted on the basis of the provisions of Article 9 of the Referendum Order 2002. Ensure that the referendum was conducted in a fair and equitable manner according to Article 9 of the Referendum Order 2002 and Article 4 (1) of the said Order was to result in positive voting results. The people of Pakistan will be understood to have served the nation as President of Pakistan for a period of five years, giving General Pervez Musharraf a democratic mandate. The petitioner argued that the sanctity of the ballot in the polling was seriously and severely harassed and thus the Chief Executive as well as the Chief Election Commissioner failed to abolish the trust, the nation trusted them. ? That democracy has been considered merely a fantasy of the sanctity of the ballot and that the democratic mandate flowing from contaminated sources cannot be considered sacrosanct. That the day of the referendum, there was alleged fraud and widespread fraud with the nation and thus the referendum was found to be a fraud, a fraud and an extremely strange criminal act committed against the Pakistani people. ? Given that the referendum was prepared, engineered, stage managed, unreliable evidence of hypothetical medical practice, it was discovered that the chief executive and chief election commissioner were unable to hold free and fair elections. That the High Court has the authority to issue guidelines and dictate that although the military coup on October 12, 1998 was validated under the doctrine of state necessity, the Chief Executive law firms from Haveli Lakha lawyer