SANA KHALIL versus SELECTION COMMITTEE, BOLAN MEDICAL COLLEGE, QUETTA
Paras 21, 22 and 26 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application issued to the father of a domicile certificate candidate for admission to medical college was denied because the candidate was denied the domicile The certificate was. Candidates can use their father's certificate from another district. The Valdetiti Selection Committee ignored the provisions of paragraphs 21 and para 22 of the prospectus in which the admission to the medical college was open to the real native and domicile students of the province. The certificate issued by the District Coordination Officer was eligible for the special seat of a district under the provisions of Para 26 of the Bolan Medical College Prosecution, which in 2000 the selection committee ignored the candidate's position in the current case. He was in control. A local certificate issued in his favor and he was a good resident of the district from which he had applied only on the basis of a domicile certificate issued to his father from another province. He would not refuse to admit the applicant. Because he never used his father's certificate, the selection committee made a mistake in ignoring the candidate's position and mistakenly said that the candidate could use his father's domicile certificate prepared by the selection committee. Based on the ideas of the future, it was not possible that the candidate was just a local candidate Is in the certificate and has not used his father's certificate. His case did not come up under paragraph 26 of the Prosecution of Bowen Medical College, whereby the High Court of 2001 directed the selection committee to look after the district
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Jehangira lawyer