Find a Lawyer

NAWABZADA MIR BALACH KHAN MARRI versus APPELLATE ELECTION TRIBUNAL, BALOCHISTAN

Conducting Orders 7, as amended by Arts 3, 8A and 10 (3) of the Representative People Act (LXXXV of 1976), Section 14 (5) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 63 (l) (i). Is. Under Article 3 of the Legal Framework Order, the 20021 and 1991 constitutional applications were accepted by the Returning Officer for the nomination of the unqualified candidate, but the Election Tribunal allowed the appeal and rejected the nomination papers required under Article 8A. Was done. The candidate who held the General Election Order, 2002, was that the Constitution was amended in accordance with Article 3 of the Legal Framework Order 2002, and that the General Elections, under the provisions of the General Elections Order, 2002, The candidate was disqualified for Article 63 (1) (i) [Amendment] of the Constitution's Judicial Requirement Notice in the Official Gazette for the Restoration of the Constitution or the amended provisions of C disqualified a candidate for participation in the election The declaration was not issued under Article 4 of the Legal Framework Order, 2002, in Article 63 (1) (i) of the Constitution without notification. The amendment was not implemented, the Election Tribunal wrongly allowed the appeal against the candidate applying Article 3 of the Legal Framework Order 2002, the order passed by the Election Tribunal had no legal effect The same was put aside and the nomination papers were approved and the High Court directed the Election Commission to make it eligible. Participate in elections Constitutional application was allowed under the circumstances advocate for immigration from Skardu lawyer