Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD KHAN ALIAS ALAM KHAN versus THE STATE

Sections / Pro Prohibition (Enforcement Order) of 1979 (4 of 1979 1979),), Arts // 44 Testimonial endorsement was fully supported by the prosecution witness, who was a member of the raiding party. The other member also examined the two long crosses, but they could not be obtained by defense, although several people gathered at the time of the arrest of the accused, and some of them were involved in the recovery process. Were asked to, but they refused to do so, all three prosecution witnesses were permanent and were at the date, time of arrest of the accused, On the contrary, there was no contradiction in their statements or line of refusal to comment on each material point related to the raiding party's 25 packet rehabilitation constitution. There is a reason. The accused's involvement in the case was a resident of a district other than the district from which he was seized in large quantities of marijuana. o In such unanimous statements it was shown by the prosecution's witnesses to indulge in enmity or enmity by the prosecution witnesses. There was no reason for the accused to have such large quantities of marijuana in his statement. Failure to disclose any reason for presence The report about the marijuana recovered from the suspect at the time of the Examiner of Chemical Examiner was positive that the complainant complained that the complainant could not be the investigating officer, he was repulsed, as the accused was raided. The party was arrested on the spot, the complainant had already sent the complaint in writing. Case registration at the police station and list of supreme court advocates from Mandra lawyer