Find a Lawyer

MUTTIULLAH KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 3 353 Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997), Section, Section evidence Defendant Defending the evidence did not appeal to the police officer and other police officers who were involved in any hostility. Deposed as witnesses, the police involved was weak because of the charge that the officer in the uniform was killed, it cannot be assumed that the actual culprit was merely involved in the case. I have been allowed to be falsely implicated so that eyewitnesses as well as the recovery witnesses have no prior hostility to the accused. There is no reason for his false involvement in the case when, according to the evidence, a blood-stained uniform was offered, but it cannot be assumed that the deceased was not on public duty at the time of the incident or that He was in straight clothes. The prosecution's testimony in the case was fully corroborated by a post-mortem report and further confirmed by the serologist's report and the report, although the Chemical Examiner pistol did not have the Franz Science Laboratory to combat the crime. Was sent, but in the case of eye witness accounts, medical evidence and other evidence available on record in the case of the Chemical Examiner and the serologist, the evidence was sufficient to link the accused to the crime and was a rare occurrence because the original criminal prosecution. Any rationale for changing the accused for proof of The reason was not present, was proven to be the prosecution's version of the story, while the accused's defense was very weak and her confidence was not affected at all, given the inheritance advocates near Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer